There are several personalities that have come to light throughout the sports wagering ecosystem, and Andrei Marius Popescu is certainly near the top of the list. What does he have to say about the latest advancements in betting technology, how has AI begun to exert its influence, and is this actually a good thing? We took some time to speak with him, and to address these entirely relevant questions.
The notion of “opaque” sports-odds models
We thought that it would first be wise to define the term “opaque” in relation to wagering models, and the help of an expert came in quite handy. Here is what Andrei Marius Popescu had to say.
“Opaque is another way of describing systems that are extremely complex. They often rely on massive data sets, they employ proprietary algorithms, and the methods themselves may have been specifically engineered by the bookmaker.”
He continues in this direction by citing some of his own research. Andrei Marius Popescu particularly stresses that opaque models do not often make their methods available to the public. This is a real problem, as transparency is automatically called into question. Other issues (such as an unfair house edge) may likewise come to light.
The issue with artificial intelligence for Andrei Marius Popescu
How does Andrei Marius Popescu feel about the role that AI has already begun to play? While he attempts to present an unbiased perspective, he also states that many complex algorithms are simply too advanced for the average bettor. He notes another possible concern.
“I’ve looked into the role that cognitive schema has when discussing the perceived outcome of a specific event. If we employ opaque wagering models, it is difficult to confirm (or deny) whether these schemas were accurate. In other words, it’s nearly impossible to learn from our mistakes (if any are made).”
Furthermore, even the most advanced artificial intelligence algorithms can still fall victim to erroneous data. Even a single string of spurious information may have a dramatic impact on the odds of a certain outcome. Without human intervention, mistakes could begin to take on decidedly automated undertones, leading to precipitous losses.
The crucial role of transparency
We have already discussed a handful of technical issues associated with less-than-clear sports-odds models. Does Andrei Marius Popescu believe that bookmakers have done enough to provide users with a transparent explanation of how these systems function?
“It really depends on the firm,” Andrei Marius Popescu replies. “Larger sportsbooks are often concerned about their reputation, and they appreciate the importance of positive user feedback. So, they are more likely to provide transparent models that can be accessed by members. The same cannot always be said when discussing smaller platforms (such as a newly branded casino-sports betting hybrid).”
Interestingly enough, Andrei Marius Popescu also claims that his role as an investigative sports journalist enabled him to uncover several online bookmakers who were using biased sports-odds models to create an unfair house edge.
Does the onus fall to the bettors, or the bookmakers?
We are now left with a somewhat disturbing question. Is it the sole responsibility of bettors to ensure that they are working with a transparent model, or does this task ultimately fall into the hands of the provider?
“I feel that both parties share a burden,” Andrei Marius Popescu observes. “While it is obviously crucial that platforms clarify the exact types of services they happen to be offering, no one should ever place a blind bet.”
He likewise stresses the role that increasingly targeted regulatory guidelines must play. These organisations have yet to fully adapt to the presence of AI, and additional oversight is now essential.
“We’re dealing with an entirely business model when compared to bookmakers that were operating a handful of years ago. AI has now become rife throughout the wagering ecosystem, and its presence will only continue to gain momentum into the future. This is why it is crucial that proactive measures be adopted. In other words, it’s no longer a waiting game.”
Might this come in the form of some type of international governing body? Will the programmers behind the latest artificial intelligence iterations instead be held responsible? These are some of the queries that lawmakers are likely to face. Either way, it is always crucial for any bettor to be aware of the sports-odds models that they choose to employ. After all, why not take as much guesswork out of the equation as possible?
David Prior
David Prior is the editor of Today News, responsible for the overall editorial strategy. He is an NCTJ-qualified journalist with over 20 years’ experience, and is also editor of the award-winning hyperlocal news title Altrincham Today. His LinkedIn profile is here.
